线阵式超声内镜在胆总管下段狭窄病变中的应用价值

Application value of linear array endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of distal common bile duct stricture lesions

  • 摘要:
    目的 评价线阵式超声内镜(L-EUS)在胆总管下段狭窄病变鉴别诊断的可行性及有效性。
    方法 收集2022年8月至2023年11月在东莞东华医院经腹部超声检查提示胆总管上段扩张,但未能明确下段狭窄病因的75例患者临床资料,所有患者均行上腹CT或磁共振胆胰管成像(MRCP),以及L- EUS检查。在上述检查结果的基础上,后续经内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)或外科手术治疗明确诊断(金标准)。部分阴性发现患者定期门诊随访,每2~3个月随访1次,共18个月。比较上腹CT、MRCP及L-EUS 3 种检查方法对胆总管下段狭窄病因的阳性检出率,并以ERCP、手术发现及随访结果为最终诊断,比较评价L-EUS鉴别诊断能力。
    结果 与上腹CT及MRCP相比,L-EUS对胆总管下段狭窄病因的阳性检出率最高,为53.3%,接近于金标准(56.0%),与上腹CT或MRCP相比差异均具有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。L-EUS发现胆总管下段狭窄病因的准确率为94.7%。其中胆总管结石诊断灵敏度为93.3%,特异度为100%,准确率为97.3%。
    结论 L-EUS对胆总管下段狭窄病变的定位及定性诊断均有较高的价值,特别对于胆总管结石的诊断能力较好。对临床上常规超声判断不清的胆总管扩张患者,可行L-EUS进一步明确下段狭窄病因。有条件时,L-EUS可作为上腹CT或MRCP检查的有效补充手段。但对于L-EUS阴性发现的患者,必要时建议进一步ERCP检查或密切随访观察。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of linear array endoscopic ultrasonography (L-EUS) in the differential diagnosis of stricture lesions in the lower common bile duct (CBD).
    Methods Clinical data of 75 patients admitted to DongGuan Tungwah Hospital from August, 2022 to November, 2023 were collected. All patients showed the dilatation of the upper common bile duct on abdominal ultrasound, but the etiology of lower segment strictures was unclear. They underwent upper abdominal CT scan, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and L-EUS. Based on these results, the final diagnosis was confirmed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or surgical operation. Patients with negative findings were subject to 18-month outpatient follow-up, once every 2-3 months. The positive detection rates of upper abdominal CT, MRCP, and L-EUS for the etiology of CBD strictures were compared. Taking ERCP, surgical findings, and follow-up results as the gold standard, the differential diagnostic ability of L-EUS was evaluated.
    Results Compared with upper abdominal CT and MRCP (both P < 0.05), L-EUS had the highest positive detection rate (53.3%) for the etiology of CBD stricture, approaching that of the gold standard (56.0%). The accuracy of L-EUS in identifying the etiology of CBD strictures was 94.7%. For CBD stones, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of L-EUS were 93.3%, 100%, and 97.3%, respectively.
    Conclusions L-EUS has high value in localizing and qualitatively diagnosing CBD stricture lesions, especially for the diagnosis of CBD stones. For patients with CBD dilatation which cannot be confirmed by routine ultrasound, L-EUS can be used to further clarify the etiology of lower segment stricture and may serve as an effective alternative to upper abdominal CT or MRCP when feasible. For patients with negative L-EUS findings, further ERCP or close follow-up is recommended if necessary.

     

/

返回文章
返回